Roger Clemens is acquitted; federal prosecutors are disappointed

Names of 12 persons (4 men and 8 women) who served as jury at the governmental case against Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government desired the jury to be convinced that Roger Clemens had lied before the Congress about intake of steroids and HGH. But since the jury acquitted Roger Clemens, the government criticized the individuals that composed the jury. Several individuals who acted as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf children, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy composed the jury.
Joyce Robinson-Paul, a political activist, was interviewed by the New York Daily News several days after Roger Clemens was acquitted. She affirmed that the jury comprehended that they had to be fair to both the government and the sportsperson. But they didn’t find anything that had to be pursued.  Later she also noticed that the federal prosecutors were not capable to prove their affirmations.
Bradford Weaver, an employee of the Canadian Embassy stated that the government was wrong. This person noted that such situations should not happen again. He also claimed that there was nothing to be prosecuted. He was interviewed by the Associated Press. He also claimed that every juror understood from the very beginning that Roger Clemens was not proven guilty of any charge. This person pointed that every juror was unanimous.
Bradford Weaver was also asked whether he considered that Roger Clemens really applied steroids. Journalists of the Associated Press also asked him whether he considered that the governmental case against the athlete represented just the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But Bradford Weaver didn’t answer the questions.
Another juror that preferred not to be identified confirmed that the jurors didn’t comprehend how the government made the decision to waste significant sums of money during five years in order to prosecute the baseball player. This person claimed that it was impossible to understand why the prosecution lasted for five years.
Other jurors didn’t present any information.
As for feds, they seemed to be wholly disappointed. They declined to respond to the affirmations presented by the jurors.